ArticlePoultry science2026
Age-related succession of the gut microbiome drives ovarian function decline in laying hens.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The precipitous decline in egg production and the deterioration of egg quality induced by aging in laying hens pose significant challenges to the poultry industry; however, the underlying systemic mechanisms remain incompletely elucidated. This study aimed to comprehensively delineate the trajectory of ovarian function decline during the aging of laying hens and to explore the underlying mechanisms involving age-related intestinal injury and the succession of the intestinal microbiome. Laying hens at the peak, mid, and late laying periods were utilized as the experimental models. The results showed that with the increase of age, the production performance of laying hens decreased significantly, the follicle reserve was exhausted, and the secretion of reproductive hormones was significantly reduced, and the expression of key steroid synthases and hormone receptors was significantly down-regulated. Furthermore, severe oxidative stress and inflammatory responses were observed in the ovaries during the late laying period, which subsequently triggered ovarian cell apoptosis. Concurrently, the normal intestinal architecture and physical barrier function were compromised in aging hens, evidenced by a significant downregulation of tight junction proteins and accompanied by marked intestinal dysbiosis. Moreover, aging induced profound alterations in the intestinal microbial community. The late laying period was characterized by a reduced abundance of beneficial bacteria, including Parabacteroides and Lactobacillus, alongside a substantial enrichment of pathogenic taxa such as Helicobacter. In order to verify whether intestinal microbes are involved in regulating ovarian function, a fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) experiment was conducted in this study. The FMT results indicated that receiving fecal microbiota from peak-laying donors effectively ameliorated the ovarian condition and alleviated ovarian functional decline in aged recipient hens, thereby confirming the regulatory role of the gut microbiota. In conclusion, by delineating ovarian functional degradation, systematically evaluating age-related intestinal tissue damage and microbiota succession, and revealing the potential link between age-associated gut microbes and core indicators of reproductive decline, this study provides comprehensive insights into hen aging. Importantly, the FMT trial substantiates the regulatory effect of the gut microbiota on ovarian aging, offering a crucial theoretical basis for targeting gut microecology to delay reproductive senescence and prolong the laying cycle in poultry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.