ReviewPoultry science2026
Multi-omics integration and artificial intelligence for the conservation and utilization of local chicken genetic resources.
Review in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Local chicken genetic resources (LCGRs), representing a unique gene pool shaped by millennia of natural and artificial selection, not only sustain the supply of high-quality protein but also serve as useful biological models for deciphering the evolution of complex traits and environmental adaptability. However, extensive introgression from commercial breeds is causing rapid genetic erosion. Systems biology and multi-omics technologies are reshaping our understanding of the regulatory networks underlying local chicken genetic resources. This review synthesizes four advances. First, at the genomic reference level, long-read sequencing is driving a transition from single linear reference assemblies to high-quality, near-telomere-to-telomere assemblies and graph pangenomes, enabling the unbiased capture of structural variations and microchromosomes. Second, multi-omics studies have begun to integrate association-based evidence across multiple biological layers, including epigenetic variation, single-cell and spatial heterogeneity, cross-tissue metabolic relationships, and host-microbiome interactions. Third, commercial introgression is severe but strongly breed-dependent, affecting 0.64% to 21.52% of the genome across eight Chinese indigenous breeds. We examine how omics findings could be translated into conservation practice by integrating three components into a proposed closed-loop framework: dynamic early-warning monitoring based on effective population size, management of functional variants using a weighted genomic relationship matrix, and primordial germ cell cryopreservation and editing. These components sit at very different levels of evidence, and the complete pipeline has not yet been evaluated longitudinally in any conservation flock. Finally, in the realm of intelligent prediction, the mechanistic attribution provided by explainable artificial intelligence and the zero-shot variant effect prediction capabilities of cross-species genomic foundation models offer two complementary routes, neither of which has yet been applied to a local chicken population. Together, these advances are shifting local chicken genetic resources management from observation-based description toward mechanism-informed decision-making. Rather than reporting an accomplished transition, this review sets out an emerging and feasible roadmap and identifies the evidence gaps that must be closed before it can be implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.