Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42777357›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

The single-cell protein from Candida utilis as a functional protein ingredient for broilers.

S Tan, J S Ma, X Y Su, X X Xu, H Q Huang, T Tu, F F Guan, H Y Luo, H M Yu, B Yao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

S TanState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 10093, China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China. Electronic address: shuaitan96@gmail.com.
J S MaState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 10093, China. Electronic address: majianshuang@caas.cn.
X Y SuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 10093, China. Electronic address: suxiaoyun@caas.cn.
X X XuBiotecnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 10081, China. Electronic address: xuxinxin@caas.cn.
H Q HuangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 10093, China. Electronic address: huanghuoqing@caas.cn.
T TuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 10093, China. Electronic address: tutao@caas.cn.
F F GuanBiotecnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 10081, China. Electronic address: guanfeifei@caas.cn.
H Y LuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 10093, China. Electronic address: luohuiying@caas.cn.
H M YuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 10093, China. Electronic address: yuhuimin@caas.cn.
B YaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 10093, China. Electronic address: binyao@caas.cn.
Y WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 10093, China. Electronic address: wangyuan08@caas.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for sustainable protein alternatives to soybean meal (SBM) in broilers diets has highlighted single-cell proteins as a promising candidate. Candida utilis protein (CUP) represents a potential substitute, yet its optimal inclusion level in broiler nutrition remains to be determined. A 42-day trial was conducted with 512 Arbor Acres broilers (1d old, initial body weights 45.00 ± 0.13 g) were purchased and randomly assigned to eight treatment groups. Treatment diets included 0% control group (CON), 1% CUP group (CUP1), 2% CUP group (CUP2), 3% CUP group (CUP3), 4% CUP group (CUP4), 5% CUP group (CUP5), 6% CUP group (CUP6) and 8% CUP group (CUP8). Growth performance exhibited a quadratic response (P < 0.001), with every phase average daily gain and average daily feed intake peaking at 4% inclusion and declining at 8%. Apparent digestibility of dry matter, crude protein and total amino acids was highest at the 3-4% inclusion levels (P < 0.05). Serum immunoglobulins immunoglobulin-Y (IgY), immunoglobulin-A (IgA), immunoglobulin-M (IgM), anti-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-10 (IL-10) and antioxidant enzyme activities superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) increased linearly with yeast supplementation (P < 0.001), whereas pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), C-reactive protein (CRP) and malondialdehyde (MDA) decreased linearly (P < 0.001). Spleen weight and abdominal fat percentage also rose with increasing inclusion. Microbial community analysis revealed numerical reductions in α diversity with increasing dietary CUP inclusion, whereas principal coordinate analysis demonstrated clear separation of bacterial communities across treatments, with the % CUP group showing the most pronounced deviation from the control group. These results demonstrate quadratic regression analysis using growth performance as the core indicator revealed a theoretically optimal CUP supplementation range of 1.6% to 2.5%. Combined with the measured application effects, the comprehensive recommended optimal inclusion level of CUP in broiler diets is 1.6% to 4.0%, with a recommended level of 4% for large-scale commercial production.

Indexed as

BrolierCandida utilis proteinDigestibilityGrowthMicrobiota and mycobiota

Identifiers

PMID42777357
PMCPMC13634700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.