Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42777347›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

The survival and cecal microbiota profile of broilers subjected to acute heat stress are contingent upon their body weight.

Vaishali Gupta, Chris Major Ncho, Meg Aui Delmonte, Yun-Ji Hwang, Woo Kyun Kim, Yang-Ho Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vaishali GuptaDivision of Animal Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea; Division of Applied Life Sciences (BK21 Four Program), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea.
Chris Major NchoDivision of Animal Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea; Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea.
Meg Aui DelmonteDivision of Animal Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea; Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea.
Yun-Ji HwangDivision of Animal Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea; Division of Applied Life Sciences (BK21 Four Program), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea.
Woo Kyun KimDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Yang-Ho ChoiDivision of Animal Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea; Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea; Division of Applied Life Sciences (BK21 Four Program), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: yhchoi@gnu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat stress (HS) is a growing challenge in poultry farming, driven by rising temperatures, which alters the gut and its microbiota. It is also assumed that body weight might be strongly correlated with a bird's ability to tolerate HS. However, there is no clear evidence of the potential interaction between HS exposure, body weight, and their effects on the host's microbiota in the short term. Hence, this study evaluated the effects of acute HS on the cecal bacterial community in chickens, relative to host body weight, and explored potential links between the microbiota and HS resistance. A total of ninety (n = 6 replicates of 5 birds) 36-day-old birds were grouped by body weight class (BWC): Low (2373.9 ± 32.1 g), Med (2681.1 ± 11.2 g), and High (3009.5 ± 36.0 g), and were subsequently either exposed to acute HS (35 ± 1 °C, 8 hours) or kept under thermoneutral conditions (CON). At the end of the trial, their cecal microbiota were subjected to metataxonomic analysis. Results revealed that, compared with their High-BWC counterparts (median survival time: 300 min), birds in the Low-BWC group exhibited greater resistance to HS (median survival time: 359 min). Metataxonomic analyses showed that acute HS increased evenness indices in the HS_Low group compared with the CON_Low group. The HS_Low group also demonstrated significantly higher evenness than the HS_High group. Conversely, beta-diversity analyses revealed no significant effects of HS or BWC. Bacterial communities were dominated by Bacillota and Bacteroidota phyla, with Bacteroides fragilis, Blautia hominis, and Enterococcus cecorum as the most abundant species. More microbial taxa were enriched in the HS group than in the CON groups. Identified biomarkers included twelve for the HS_Low, five for the HS_Med, and three for the HS_High, with Mediterraneibacter glycyrrhizinilyticus, Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus, and Clostridium phoceensis being the most significant for each group, respectively. Relative abundances of Erysipelotrichia, Erysipelotrichales, and Erysipelotrichaceae exhibited a linear decrease with the ratio between initial and final BW. Microbial co-occurrence networks were resilient to acute HS, with no structural differences between the CON and HS groups. Overall, these findings suggest that the BWC may serve as a reliable predictor of acute HS survival in broiler chickens. However, the greater HS resistance observed in lighter birds may be associated with rapid changes in cecal microbiota evenness during exposure. Besides, Erysipelotrichaceae may serve as a microbial indicator of HS resistance in broilers, warranting further investigation.

Indexed as

Body weightBroilersGutHeat stressMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID42777347
PMCPMC13625775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.