ArticleEuropean journal of radiology2026
Impact of MRI quality on the accuracy of targeted prostate biopsy: A prospective PI-QUAL analysis.
Article in European journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesMultiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has improved the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). However, the diagnostic utility of mpMRI is heavily dependent on image quality, which is often inconsistent across clinical settings. We investigated the association between mpMRI quality, assessed via the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score, and the accuracy of MRI-targeted biopsies (TBx) compared to systematic biopsies (SBx).
methodsIn this prospective study of 124 patients, image quality was evaluated for T2-weighted (T2W), diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences using PI-QUAL v2. A biopsy "miss" was defined as a case where SBx detected a higher Gleason grade group than TBx. Statistical analyses, including Mann-Whitney U tests and multivariate logistic regression, were employed to identify predictors of TBx failure.
resultsA total of 15 patients (12.1%) had a TBx "miss." Univariate analysis revealed that suboptimal T2W (p = 0.003) and DCE (p = 0.015) quality were significantly associated with biopsy failure. In a multivariate model, T2W quality remained a clinically potent predictor of inaccuracy (Odds ratio: 12.1, 95% confidence interval: 0.9-164.7, p = 0.06).
conclusionSuboptimal MRI quality, particularly the T2W sequence, is a primary driver of TBx failure. When faced with low PI-QUAL scores, clinicians should remain aware that MRI is less likely to improve detection of cancer compared to SBx. Ideally, low PI-QUAL score MRIs should be repeated to optimize the detection of csPCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.