ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Standardized Manual-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment in Patients With Comorbid Mental Disorders: Qualitative Interview Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Smoking prevalence is disproportionately high among individuals with mental disorders, who also show reduced cessation success, suggesting that current cessation interventions may not fully address their specific needs. A barrier to smoking cessation is the fear that quitting may worsen mental health, yet little is known about how individuals with mental disorders experience guideline-conform cessation treatments, which may address such concerns. Objective: This qualitative study explored the perspectives of smoking individuals with comorbid mental disorders who participated in a standardized, manual-based, cognitive behavioral smoking cessation program to identify targets for optimizing guideline-conform interventions for this population, spanning treatment engagement, perceived challenges, and facilitators within this context. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 participants representing diverse cessation trajectories (sustained abstinence, relapse, and no quit attempt) 6 months after treatment completion. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Three overarching themes were identified. First, participants described smoking cessation as a multidimensional, processual experience extending beyond behavioral change to encompass psychological and social dimensions, characterized by nonlinearity, adaptive meaning-making, and improvements in self-efficacy despite transient strain during early abstinence. Second, smoking was experienced as a functionally embedded practice serving affective, habitual, and social functions, with motivation emerging as dynamic and relationally sustained rather than stable. Third, treatment engagement was shaped by motivational states and contextual circumstances, with participants offering favorable evaluations of the structured intervention alongside recommendations for greater individualization and flexibility. Notably, mental health-related concerns about cessation largely persisted despite predominantly positive or neutral mental health outcomes, a pattern consistent with cognitive immunization processes. Conclusions: Guideline-conform smoking cessation treatment appears feasible and largely well-received by individuals with comorbid mental disorders. The findings highlight the need for targeted psychoeducation to address persistent misconceptions about the mental health risks of cessation, as well as individualized, context-sensitive treatment adaptations, including greater flexibility in session structure, motivational support beyond the active treatment phase, and explicit attention to the social and functional embeddedness of smoking, to improve cessation outcomes in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.