ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
A Hybrid Rule-Based and Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support System to Support Prescription Review: Development and External Validation Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anticoagulants are high-alert medications with substantial risk of serious bleeding, yet dosing and prescribing errors remain common. Although clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can mitigate these errors, their impact is constrained by alert fatigue and limited interpretability. Objective: We developed and validated a hybrid CDSS that integrates rule-based logic with machine learning to improve the safe use of anticoagulants. Methods: This multicenter study used electronic health record data on anticoagulant prescriptions from 3 tertiary hospitals (1 for system development and internal validation and 2 for external validation). The hybrid CDSS combined a knowledge-based rule engine with a machine learning model trained to predict whether an anticoagulant prescription would require pharmacist intervention. The system was iteratively refined through pilot testing, internal validation, and external validation. Results: A total of 75,200 anticoagulant prescriptions were used for model development. The final hybrid CDSS comprised 44 patient-specific rules and 1129 drug-drug interaction rules, combined with a CatBoost classifier (version 1.2.5; Yandex) for alert prioritization. During internal validation, 88 (18.9%) alerts were generated; all were technically correct; 88.6% (n=78) were deemed clinically relevant; 86.4% (n=76) were considered clinically useful; and 13.6% (n=12) required pharmacist intervention. In external validation across 2 hospitals, alert rates ranged from 22.6% (7/31) to 32.1% (310/966), with 18.8% (22/117) to 57.1% (4/7) of alerts requiring pharmacist intervention. The hybrid CDSS showed strong discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.871-0.963). No false negatives were identified, but the estimates should be interpreted cautiously given the short validation periods and limited number of intervention-requiring prescriptions. Conclusions: A hybrid CDSS integrating rule-based logic with machine learning demonstrated high technical accuracy and clinical relevance across multiple institutions, suggesting its potential as a practical tool for supporting pharmacist-led anticoagulant prescription review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.