ArticleScience advances2026
Magmatic origin of the Dewar magnetic anomaly: Implications for an early lunar dynamo.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Moon's ancient magnetic field provides critical insights into lunar thermal and magnetic evolution, yet the lifetime of the interior dynamo remains debated. Returned samples yield complex and contradictory paleomagnetic records, while orbital data reveal crustal magnetic anomalies of uncertain origin from either a core dynamo or transient impact-generated fields. Here, we jointly invert gravity and magnetic observations in the region around the Dewar swirl, a high-albedo feature associated with the Dewar magnetic anomaly. We identify a shallow, magnetized, high-density body consistent with buried mare basalt. Our estimates require a paleointensity exceeding 11 microtesla, suggesting an active lunar dynamo about 4.2 billion years ago, as constrained by the superposed basin ejecta. The results also show that swirl formation requires horizontal magnetization and iron oxide enrichment. These findings link a magnetic anomaly to its geologic origin and magnetizing field, providing constraints on the lunar magnetic and volcanic history.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.