ArticlePloS one2026
Distributed electricity-carbon co-optimization of hydrogen energy storage microgrids with dynamic laplace perturbation and model predictive control.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrogen energy storage microgrids can improve renewable-energy accommodation and cross-energy flexibility, while repeated boundary-variable exchange in distributed scheduling may expose private operating information. This paper develops a privacy-aware electricity-carbon co-optimization framework that integrates day-ahead distributed clearing with intra-day model predictive control (MPC). The day-ahead model coordinates electricity, heat, hydrogen conversion, battery storage, and thermal storage while accounting for direct gas-boiler emissions and indirect emissions associated with imported electricity. A dynamically decaying Laplace mechanism is incorporated into the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), and privacy performance is evaluated through finite-transcript privacy-budget accounting and reconstruction-based leakage analysis. Compared with fixed Laplace noise, the dynamic mechanism exhibits a higher baseline mean leakage-risk score (0.67 versus 0.58), but reduces the centralized cost gap from 2.85% to 0.94% and the number of iterations from 50 to 38. Matched-condition tests further show lower cost gaps at equal leakage risk and lower leakage risk at equal cost gap. An inverse-variance reconstruction attack reveals increased information exposure during later iterations. Meanwhile, the intra-day MPC maintains feasible multi-energy operation under the tested forecast errors. The base-case operational emissions are 2.09 t CO2, and the carbon-parameter sensitivity analysis shows a smooth variation in cleared cost. The results demonstrate the coordinated economic, privacy, and convergence characteristics of the proposed scheduling framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.