Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776996›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Failure to classically condition G. dorotocephala and S. mediterranea flatworms using historical and contemporary light-shock paradigms.

Zachary S Kelso, Madeleine C Snyder, Samuel J Gershman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachary S KelsoDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8817-3099
Madeleine C SnyderDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Samuel J GershmanDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-3298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planarian flatworms represent one of the most evolutionarily informative nervous systems for an account of ancient bilaterian brains. Likewise, the unparalleled regenerative ability of planarians makes possible certain investigations of neural development, memory, and behavior that are simply impossible with other model organisms. Despite these facts, learning and memory are today underexplored in planarians, likely due in part to the controversial legacy of 20th-century experiments on the transfer of memories between individual flatworms. Here, we attempted to replicate and extend the classical conditioning experiments in planarians that were the basis of the later memory transfer work. We failed to find evidence of learning using both historical and contemporary conditioning protocols, and using computer vision methods to avoid subjectivity in manual video annotation. Our results cast doubt on the suitability of historic conditioning protocols for Girardia dorotocephala and Schmidtea mediterranea planarians. We encourage future researchers to explore more ethologically relevant conditioning paradigms to establish a behavioral foundation for investigating the molecular basis of learning.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalLightPlanariansAnimalsMemory

Identifiers

PMID42776996
PMCPMC13600496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.