ArticlePloS one2026
Failure to classically condition G. dorotocephala and S. mediterranea flatworms using historical and contemporary light-shock paradigms.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Planarian flatworms represent one of the most evolutionarily informative nervous systems for an account of ancient bilaterian brains. Likewise, the unparalleled regenerative ability of planarians makes possible certain investigations of neural development, memory, and behavior that are simply impossible with other model organisms. Despite these facts, learning and memory are today underexplored in planarians, likely due in part to the controversial legacy of 20th-century experiments on the transfer of memories between individual flatworms. Here, we attempted to replicate and extend the classical conditioning experiments in planarians that were the basis of the later memory transfer work. We failed to find evidence of learning using both historical and contemporary conditioning protocols, and using computer vision methods to avoid subjectivity in manual video annotation. Our results cast doubt on the suitability of historic conditioning protocols for Girardia dorotocephala and Schmidtea mediterranea planarians. We encourage future researchers to explore more ethologically relevant conditioning paradigms to establish a behavioral foundation for investigating the molecular basis of learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.