ArticlePloS one2026
Phase response curve and RNA-sequencing demonstrate spiders' sensitivity to light and pinpoint candidate light-responsive genes.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spiders can maintain a wide range of free-running periods while still being entrained to a 24-hour day. To investigate the underlying mechanism of this entrainment, we constructed the phase-response curve (PRC) for the orb weaver, Metazygia wittfeldae, by subjecting the spiders to one-hour light pulses at various times throughout the circadian day. The resulting type 0 PRC showed high amplitude (> 6 hour) phase advance and delays when the light pulse was applied during circadian time (CT) 16-18, including a break point of delays to advances. We then investigated the genetic mechanism of response to light by splitting M. wittfeldae adult females entrained to 12 hours light:12 hours dark (LD 12:12) into two groups. One group received a 1-hour light pulse 5 hours after lights off (equivalent to CT17), and the other group did not. We then sacrificed spiders for RNA isolations 1 and 10 hours after the light pulse. We identified numerous genes that were downregulated by the light pulse 1 hour after the pulse relative to no pulse group. Intriguingly, many of these genes had a flipped pattern of expression 9 hours later - the pulse group had higher expression than the no pulse group. We also identified clock gene homologs in M. wittfeldae that had distinct expression patterns from other arthropods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.