ArticlePloS one2026
Network analysis of mental well-being, psychological inflexibility, and psychopathological symptoms in individuals seeking online psychological support.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental well-being encompasses positive psychological functioning, life satisfaction, and engagement with daily activities. It is influenced by multiple interrelated factors, including symptoms of stress, anxiety, depression, and psychological inflexibility. Network analysis provides a data-driven framework for examining the complex interconnections between these components and for identifying elements that may play a central role in the mental well-being system. The present study aimed to identify key elements related to stress, anxiety, depression, and psychological inflexibility associated with mental well-being in individuals seeking online psychological support.
methodsThis cross-sectional study analyzed data drawn from the Well-being online intervention. A total of 941 Mexican participants were included. A psychological network comprising seventy-four items was estimated, and centrality indices (strength, closeness, and betweenness) were computed to determine the relative importance of individual elements within the network. Network comparisons by gender were conducted to evaluate global and local differences.
resultsThe network revealed multiple inter-domain associations, particularly negative relationships between mental well-being and symptoms of depression, anxiety, negative stress, and psychological inflexibility. Items reflecting self-evaluation and emotional well-being consistently emerged as the most central elements in the network across centrality metrics. Gender-based comparisons indicated overall structural similarity between networks, although differences were observed in the strength of specific connections.
conclusionsNetwork analysis identified central elements linking mental well-being with psychological distress and inflexibility in a population seeking online psychological support. These findings contribute to a systems-level understanding of mental well-being and highlight potential targets for psychological interventions to enhance well-being and reduce distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.