Trial reportPloS one2026
Implementation of evidence-based practice guidelines to prevent urinary retention in hospitals: A process evaluation in orthopaedic care.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04700969 (Onset PrevenTIon of Urinary Retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and Rehabilitation, OPTION - a Knowledge Implementation Study on a Facilitation Strategy for Multi-professional Clinical Champion Teams), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Onset PrevenTIon of Urinary Retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and Rehabilitation, OPTION - a Knowledge Implementation Study on a Facilitation Strategy for Multi-professional Clinical Champion Teams
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesNational clinical practice guidelines promote evidence-based practice, though are hardly implemented without local facilitation. While further research is needed as for what facilitation strategies work, in what context, and with what outcomes, the Onset PrevenTIon of urinary retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and rehabilitation (OPTION) trialled a tailored implementation intervention for evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in orthopaedic care. Informed by the principles of realism, this paper describes the evaluation of the context, mechanisms, and outcomes triad of locally assembled teams of nursing and rehabilitation staff and their managers offered monthly guideline implementation support for one year.
methodsA process evaluation incorporating group interviews with designated teams across seven intervention sites, at the end of their programme and 12 months later. Individual facilitator logs, photos and educational material from the intervention, and external facilitators' notes were added. The data was thematically analysed, describing and contrasting the initial hypotheses with a refined understanding of the theoretical and practical features of the process and outcomes.
resultsWith increased knowledge of the content and purpose of the guidelines and further recognition of their local context and implementation essentials, the intervention facilitated the local, designated teams to practise concurrent quality improvement procedures and skills. Having both staff and managers on the teams authorised modifications of their local context in favour of guideline implementation. The one-year support programme enabled primary implementation steps, though a comprehension of what could work and why required that the teams saw the intervention through.
conclusionLearning about the implementation of a clinical practice guideline is a local effort. This requires dedicated teams with sustained roles, resources, and mandate, with external implementation and clinical support. Nevertheless, this is a slow process that requires repeated or prolonged follow-up to identify long-term implementation intervention outcomes.
trial registrationUS National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry: NCT04700969. Registered 8 January 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04700969.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.