ArticlePloS one2026
Gestational age and device-measured physical activity in adolescents and adults: A linkage of the HUNT Study and Medical Birth Registry.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is limited knowledge of the relationship between gestational age and physical activity assessed by accelerometers in population-based cohort studies. We examined how gestational age predicts physical activity among adolescents and adults. Data from 12 896 participants (13-52 years) with physical activity assessed by two tri-axial accelerometers for seven days in the population-based Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT Study) were linked to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Metabolic equivalent of task (MET) min/day and min/day in total, moderate to vigorous, and light physical activity were calculated. Effects of gestational age (in weeks) and birth weight (in grams) on physical activity were modelled using fractional polynomials and linear regression. Gestational age predicted MET min/day in light physical activity (B = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.02 to 3.07) in the total sample, especially among females (B = 2.14, 95% CI: 0.33 to 3.93), and in total physical activity among adolescents (B = 2.44, 95% CI: 0.16 to 4.88). Gestational age predicted min/day in total physical activity in the total sample (B = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.07 to 1.90), among females (B = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.11 to 2.40) and adolescents (B = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.02 to 2.12). There were no non-linear or linear effects of birth weight on physical activity. Shorter gestation predicted less physical activity in the total sample, among females, and in adolescents. The associations with total physical activity are by and large consistent with previous observations that individuals born preterm with very low birth weight have lower rates of physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.