Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776927›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Prenatal substance exposure and 5-year child protection outcomes among infants not reported at birth.

Julia Reddy, Davida M Schiff, Anna Austin, Hendree E Jones, Laura J Faherty, Rebecca Rebbe, Anissa Vines, Emily Putnam-Hornstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julia ReddyUniversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0314-6959
Davida M SchiffMassGeneral Hospital for Children, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Anna AustinDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Hendree E JonesDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Laura J FahertyRAND, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Rebecca RebbeUniversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6759-1701
Anissa VinesUniversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Emily Putnam-HornsteinUniversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

Impacts of Telehealth Policies on Inequities in Perinatal Behavioral Health Care Access and OutcomesR01MH138475 · NIMH · RAND CORPORATION · PI Laura Johnson Faherty, Rachel Keller Landis · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
Implementation and Outcomes of Child Protection System Reporting Policies Regarding Infants Born with Prenatal Substance ExposureF31DA057756 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REDDY, JULIA · 2023 to 2024
$81k
ACL HHS K01CE003548NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA057756NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH138475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discretionary child protection system (CPS) reporting policies allow some substance-exposed infants to be discharged from the hospital without a maltreatment report, but it is unknown whether risk for later system involvement varies according to exposure status. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of CPS involvement in the first 5 years of life as predicted by prenatal substance exposure among California births in 2018. At 5 years, less than 14% of exposed children experienced CPS reports of maltreatment harm or substantiated CPS reports. Exposed children were more likely to be reported for maltreatment harm at 5 years (adjusted Risk Difference (aRD)=0.03, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.04), including a subgroup with only cannabis exposure (aRD = 0.03, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.04) compared with unexposed infants. Prenatally exposed children were more likely to experience a substantiated report within 5 years compared with those without exposure (aRD = 0.03, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.03). Findings suggest that families affected by prenatal substance exposure who do not have apparent safety concerns at birth may benefit from support to prevent future instances of system intervention or child maltreatment.

Indexed as

Child AbuseChild Protective ServicesPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsSubstance-Related DisordersCaliforniaChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42776927
PMCPMC13600510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.