ReviewHematology reports2026
Anticoagulants, Their Laboratory Monitoring, and Reversal.
Review in Hematology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anticoagulant therapy has undergone substantial evolution over the past century, progressing from early parenteral agents such as heparin to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and, more recently, to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This review provides an overview of the major classes of anticoagulants, including unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux, direct thrombin inhibitors, VKAs, and DOACs, with emphasis on their mechanisms of action, clinical applications, laboratory monitoring, and reversal strategies. While UFH remains widely used in acute settings, its unpredictable pharmacokinetics and risk of heparin induced thrombocytopenia have led to increased use of LMWH and fondaparinux. VKAs, historically the cornerstone of oral anticoagulation, are limited by variable dosing requirements and the need for routine monitoring. In contrast, DOACs have transformed anticoagulation management through predictable pharmacokinetics, fixed dosing, and improved safety profiles, and are now first line therapies for several thromboembolic conditions. The development of targeted reversal agents, including protamine, vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, and andexanet alfa, has significantly enhanced the safety of anticoagulant therapy in the setting of major bleeding or urgent procedures. Laboratory assessment remains critical for selecting anticoagulants and evaluating clinical scenarios, with evolving roles for anti-Xa assays, thrombin-based assays, and mass spectrometry techniques. Emerging anticoagulants targeting factors XI, XII, and XIII represent a promising future direction with the potential to further reduce bleeding risk while maintaining efficacy. Overall, continued advances in anticoagulant pharmacology, monitoring, and reversal strategies are driving a shift toward safer and more individualized patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.