ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Oculomotor Profiles in Children Wearing Different Myopia Control Lenses: A Real-World Eye Tracking Study.
Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare oculomotor profiles among children wearing orthokeratology, defocus spectacle, and diffusion optics technology lenses in a routine pediatric myopia management setting. This real-world observational study included children who had worn one of the three lens types for approximately one year and had available eye tracking data. Lens type was selected during routine clinical care rather than assigned by the investigators. Oculomotor parameters were compared among lens groups using Kruskal-Wallis tests with false discovery rate correction. One-year spherical equivalent change was examined only in the defocus spectacle and diffusion optics technology groups. Adjusted and exploratory analyses included age, sex, baseline spherical equivalent, baseline axial length, axial elongation, and parental education categories. A total of 134 children were analyzed, including 46 in the orthokeratology group, 49 in the defocus spectacle group, and 39 in the diffusion optics technology group. Significant group differences were observed for microsaccade frequency (FDR adjusted
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.