ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Knowledge and Practices of South African Optometrists Regarding Childhood Myopia Management.
Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myopia is a growing public health problem expected to affect half the global population by 2050, making appropriate management of the condition necessary. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the knowledge and practices of South African optometrists regarding childhood myopia management. A quantitative, cross-sectional, descriptive design with a survey method was employed. An online questionnaire was distributed to practicing optometrists and included questions related to demographic information, knowledge of myopia and associated ocular pathologies, diagnostic work-up and management of childhood myopia. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics, and further analysed with univariate binary and ordinal logistic regression analysis where the independent variables were years of experience, certification and interest. A total of 124 completed questionnaires were received. The majority of participants used non-cycloplegic refraction and less than 20% performed dilated fundus examinations. Single vision distance spectacles were most commonly prescribed despite awareness of the efficacy of interventions to slow myopia progression. However, factors such as cost and the need for clinical guidelines limit the practice of evidence-based management. Participants were aware of some of the ocular pathologies associated with high myopia, indicating that this knowledge needs to be reinforced. Results from this study may be used to aid optometry policy development, regulatory council decisions and guide the content of professional development programmes to enhance knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.