ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence for In-Flight Detection of Space-Related Ocular Trauma: Bridging Diagnostic Gaps in Microgravity.
Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ocular trauma represents a threat to crew safety and mission performance in space. Microgravity, confined environments, and exposure to particulate matter, chemicals, and mechanical hazards place astronauts at risk for corneal abrasions, open-globe injuries, chemical burns, lens dislocation, retinal detachment, orbital fractures, and barotrauma. Diagnostic capabilities during spaceflight remain limited by resources, lack of specialist expertise, and communication delays with Earth. Artificial intelligence, particularly convolutional neural networks and multimodal models, may help address these gaps through image interpretation, risk stratification, and longitudinal monitoring. Convolutional neural networks can extract hierarchical features from imaging data to identify subtle structural abnormalities, while multimodal models integrate imaging with clinical and environmental parameters to generate more comprehensive assessments. Terrestrial ophthalmology studies demonstrate the potential of these approaches across optical coherence tomography, ultrasound, fundus photography, and anterior-segment imaging. This review examines how these capabilities can be matched to ocular injuries during spaceflight, compares the suitability of different approaches across injury types, and identifies pathways toward autonomous care. Particular emphasis is given to spaceflight-related imaging and physiologic changes, constrained onboard hardware, and integration into workflows that support non-expert crew members. Collectively, these applications may expand diagnostic capabilities and enable earlier, more informed management during long-duration missions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.