ArticleMethods and protocols2026
LAWS-HiC: A Locally Adaptive Weighting and Screening (LAWS) Approach to Improve Detection of Long-Range Chromatin Interactions from Hi-C Data.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hi-C technologies are widely used to study genome-wide chromosome spatial organization. Among various Hi-C data analyses, detecting long-range chromatin interactions (i.e., 3D peak calling) is particularly critical due to its direct relevance to gene regulation. However, most existing peak callers fail to account for spatial dependencies in high-resolution (e.g., ≤10 kb) Hi-C data, often resulting in suboptimal accuracy. To address this limitation, we introduce LAWS-HiC, a novel computational method based on the Locally Adaptive Weighting and Screening (LAWS) approach. LAWS-HiC adjusts
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.