ReviewPediatric reports2026
Review of Artificial Intelligence for Automated Assessment of Lines, Drains, and Airways on Pediatric and Adult Chest Radiographs.
Review in Pediatric reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate placement of lines, drains, and airways (LDAs) is essential for the safe management of critically ill patients, as malpositioned medical devices can result in severe complications ranging from ineffective treatment to life-threatening injury. Chest radiography (CXR) is the primary imaging modality for confirming the placement of many LDAs; however, the growing volume and complexity of bedside CXRs have created increasing demand for rapid, reliable interpretation. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled automated detection, localization, and position assessment of LDA devices, supporting opportunities to improve clinical workflow and patient safety. This review summarizes recent developments in AI algorithms for automated LDA assessment on CXRs, emphasizing their clinical applications, technical approaches, performance, and limitations. The review begins with clinical characteristics, radiographic appearance, and placement criteria of common LDA categories, followed by a survey of AI methods for presence detection, device localization, and position classification. Although some models have achieved performance approaching that of radiologists, most do not perform at the level needed for clinical deployment. Future research should prioritize multicenter validation, standardized annotation protocols, pediatric-specific datasets, and anatomically informed models capable of simultaneously evaluating multiple LDA devices. Advances in these areas will facilitate the integration of AI-assisted LDA assessment into clinical decision support and ultimately improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.