Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776640›Full record

ReviewJournal of eye movement research2026

How Does Peripheral Vision Feel Rich? A Selective Review.

Amelia Beatson, Anna Metzger, Matteo Toscani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amelia BeatsonSchool of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK.
Anna MetzgerSchool of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK.
Matteo ToscaniSchool of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK.

Funding

British Academy SRG2324\240833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human vision is profoundly non-uniform. Spatial resolution, contrast sensitivity, colour discrimination decrease, and the appearance of visual features become increasingly distorted with retinal eccentricity, yet visual experience appears remarkably rich and stable across the entire visual field. This apparent paradox has been a central challenge in vision science: how can a perceptually rich world emerge from a sensory system that samples only a small fraction of the environment with high precision? We argue that cognitive biases alone may be insufficient to explain the apparent richness of peripheral vision and review evidence suggesting that perceptual processes may also contribute. Information sampled in central vision can be extrapolated to peripheral appearance, while prior knowledge and learned regularities allow the visual system to infer missing or distorted peripheral information. These processes operate within the constraints of active vision, where eye movements selectively sample task-relevant information rather than building a complete detailed representation of the scene. We propose that the interaction between centre-to-periphery extrapolation and learned predictions may contribute to rich peripheral experience, specially where we direct attention, allowing the visual system to maintain a coherent and useful representation of the world.

Indexed as

active visionperipheral visionspatial vision

Identifiers

PMID42776640
PMCPMC13600028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.