ReviewJournal of eye movement research2026
Abnormal Fixational Eye Movements in Ophthalmic Disease: Implications for Visual Function and Clinical Assessment.
Review in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ophthalmic disorders cause pathological abnormalities in fixational movements. Across disorders, recent studies demonstrate that fixation can be disrupted, often with reported changes in stability and other oculomotor dynamics as the conditions progress. Some of these changes are functionally linked to reduced visual acuity, degraded reading performance, and impaired binocular function. In this narrative review, we synthesize recent work on fixational eye movements and fixation instability in ophthalmic disease. We argue that fixational measures may provide research biomarkers and clinical correlates of disease progression. These metrics could eventually contribute to treatment monitoring applications. The development of accessible and non-invasive eye-tracking tools could enhance clinical interventions. Continued progress will depend on establishing robust normative datasets and determining which oculomotor metrics provide reliable clinical information across disease states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.