Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776529›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Prophylactic vs Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mahir Karakas, Shiva Sophia Nicolay, Dominic Wichmann, Stefan Schmiedel, Marylyn M Addo, Anna Nosko, Natalie Lund, Apurva Shrivastava, Isabell Pink, Daniel Duerschmied and 17 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04542408 (Hamburg Edoxaban for Anticoagulation in COVID-19 Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04542408 phase3completednot on this map

Hamburg Edoxaban for Anticoagulation in COVID-19 Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2020 to 2023Enrolled140ConditionsCovid19ArmsAnticoagulation Agents (Edoxaban and/or high dose LMWH), Low dose Low molecular weight heparin or Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Mahir KarakasDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Shiva Sophia NicolayDepartment of Medicine 3, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Dominic WichmannDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan SchmiedelDepartment of Medicine 1, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Marylyn M AddoDepartment of Medicine 1, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Anna NoskoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Natalie LundDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Apurva ShrivastavaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Isabell PinkDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Daniel DuerschmiedDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology, and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nadine GauchelDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Elisabeth SchnoyInternal Medicine III, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Ulrich-Frank PapeDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Berthold BeinDepartment for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, and Pain Therapy, Asklepios Klinik St Georg, Asklepios Medical School, Hamburg, Germany.
Philipp BraschDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Dirk ArnoldDepartment of Oncology, Haematology, Palliative Medicine, Rheumatology and Pulmonology, Asklepios Tumor Center Hamburg, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
Katrin MaeversDepartment of Oncology, Haematology, Palliative Medicine, Rheumatology and Pulmonology, Asklepios Tumor Center Hamburg, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
Sebastian RaschTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine-Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johanna ErberTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine-Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tobias LahmerTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine-Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tanja ZellerUniversity of Luebeck, Institute of Cardiogenetics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.
Florian LangerMedical Clinic and Policlinic II, Center for Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Ann-Kathrin OzgaInstitute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Anna SulingInstitute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Antonia ZapfInstitute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Dominik JarczakDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan KlugeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Coagulopathy in the context of COVID-19 is a major threat due to deep vein thromboses and pulmonary embolisms. Objective: To assess whether therapeutic anticoagulation on top of standard of care (SOC) compared with prophylactic anticoagulation as part of SOC can improve objective patient-relevant end points. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, assessor-blinded, multicenter, parallel-group (1:1), placebo-controlled, superiority randomized clinical trial (HERO-19) assessed patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 who were hospitalized in an intensive care unit or non-intensive care ward at 1 of 10 university hospitals in Germany from November 12, 2020, to January 15, 2023. Data analysis was conducted after the final database lock in February 2024. Interventions: Patients were treated for 42 days. Patients enrolled in the experimental group received therapeutic anticoagulation using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) body weight adapted during the hospital stay and oral anticoagulation using edoxaban, 60 mg daily, after being discharged from the hospital. Patients enrolled in the control group received prophylactic anticoagulation using LMWH as part of SOC while in the hospital and placebo after discharge. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was time to the first occurrence of all-cause mortality and/or venous thromboembolism and/or arterial thromboembolism within up to 42 days. Potential thromboembolic events were assessed by duplex ultrasonography of arms and legs at day 14 or discharge and day 42. The primary safety outcome was major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis classification. Results: A total of 139 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.4 [13.7] years; 93 [67%] male and 46 [33%] female) were included in the study. Of these, 71 patients (51%) were randomized to prophylactic anticoagulation group, whereas 68 (49%) were randomized to the therapeutic anticoagulation group. The primary outcome occurred in 14 of 67 patients (21%; 2.31 incidence per patient-year) assigned to therapeutic anticoagulation and 20 of 70 (29%; 3.37 incidence per patient-year) assigned to prophylactic anticoagulation (primary end point assessment not available for 2 patients) with primary end point assessment (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.38-1.48; P = .40). In the per-protocol analysis, the hazard ratio was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.32-1.37; P = .26). A total of 7 bleeding events occurred in the intervention group, whereas 6 bleeding events occurred in the control group. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients hospitalized with COVID-19, in-hospital therapeutic anticoagulation with LMWH followed by edoxaban to day 42 did not statistically significantly reduce death and/or thromboembolic events compared with prophylactic anticoagulation followed by placebo. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04542408.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsCOVID-19Heparin, Low-Molecular-WeightPyridinesAgedFemaleGermanyHemorrhageHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPulmonary EmbolismSARS-CoV-2ThiazolesAnticoagulantsedoxabanHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightPyridinesThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID42776529
PMCPMC13602004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.