Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776473›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2026

Comparative Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Sulfonylureas, DPP4 Inhibitors, and Thiazolidinediones in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.

James Amamoo, Yan Wang, Hongjiao Liu, Manasvi Sundar, Yan Song, Lin Xie, Sherif Mehanna, Josh Noone, Caroline Swift, Matthew R Weir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James AmamooNovo Nordisk Inc, Plainsboro, New Jersey, USA.
Yan WangAnalysis Group Inc, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Hongjiao LiuAnalysis Group Inc, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Manasvi SundarAnalysis Group Inc, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Yan SongAnalysis Group Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lin XieNovo Nordisk Inc, Plainsboro, New Jersey, USA. wlsx@novonordisk.com.
Sherif MehannaNovo Nordisk Inc, Plainsboro, New Jersey, USA.
Josh NooneNovo Nordisk Inc, Plainsboro, New Jersey, USA.
Caroline SwiftNovo Nordisk Inc, Plainsboro, New Jersey, USA.
Matthew R WeirSchool of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOnce-weekly (OW) semaglutide has shown renal benefits in clinical trials for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study compared clinical outcomes between OW semaglutide and selected oral glucose-lowering medications in real-world settings.

methodsAdults with T2D and CKD were identified from the Optum's de-identified Clinformatics

resultsUsing model-based estimates at 12 months, OW semaglutide was associated with greater reductions in HbA1c (- 0.54%), body weight (- 6.69 kg), SBP (- 3.63 mmHg), and greater improvement in eGFR (2.06 mL/min/1.73 m

conclusionsIn real-world practice, OW semaglutide has been associated with sustained benefits in glycemic control, eGFR improvement, weight loss, and SBP reduction over selected oral glucose-lowering medications among patients with T2D and CKD who were ineligible for or with suboptimal response to SGLT2i. It has also been associated with a reduced risk of the composite renal outcome in patients meeting the eligibility criteria for the renal outcome analysis.

Indexed as

Chronic kidney diseaseComparative effectivenessKidney disease progressionOnce-weekly semaglutideType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.