Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776448›Full record

ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2026

Initial Validation of the Immigration-Related Coercive Control Scale Among Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.

Iris Cardenas, Marcela Sarmiento Mellinger, Tina Jiwatram-Negrón, Judy L Postmus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iris CardenasUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, USA. iris.cardenas@ssw.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0486-3909
Marcela Sarmiento MellingerUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, USA.
Tina Jiwatram-NegrónArizona State University, Phoenix, USA.
Judy L PostmusUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immigrant survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) experience coercive control tactics that exploit their immigration status, yet no validated measure of these tactics exists. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Immigration-Related Coercive Control Scale (IRCCS), a brief five-item measure. Data were drawn from two independent samples of immigrant IPV survivors recruited from domestic violence organizations (Sample 1, n = 196; Sample 2, n = 192). We conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using Sample 1 and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using Sample 2. Internal consistency, cross-sample factor congruence, and convergent validity with established measures of psychological, physical, sexual, and economic abuse were also assessed. The EFA supported a one-factor structure accounting for 35.8% of the variance, and the CFA supported this structure after allowing a residual association between two conceptually related items. Internal consistency was acceptable in both samples (ω = 0.73; ω = 0.79). Tucker's congruence coefficient was 0.97, indicating stable factor loadings across samples. The IRCCS was positively and significantly associated with other forms of IPV (r = .25 to 0.42), supporting convergent validity. The IRCCS shows promising psychometric properties as a brief measure of immigration-related coercive control. It offers researchers and practitioners a tool to identify a form of violence that other IPV instruments do not capture, with potential applications across clinical, advocacy, and legal settings.

Indexed as

Coercive controlImmigrant survivorImmigrationIntimate partner violencePsychometricsScale validation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.