Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776441›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2026

Beyond Representation: Metaphor as a Mechanism for Interpersonal Reconstruction of Embodied Experience.

Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Arash Ghahraman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Omid Khatin-ZadehSchool of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. khatinzadeh.omid@yahoo.com.
Arash GhahramanInstitute of Chemistry, Department of Physical Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human experience is fundamentally embodied, involving the continuous interaction of external perception, bodily awareness, physiological states, and affective responses. However, because subjective experiences are multidimensional and personally situated, communicating their qualitative character presents a fundamental challenge. Existing theories of metaphor have primarily emphasized its role in conceptual representation, reasoning, and meaning construction, whereas less attention has been given to how metaphor enables individuals to make embodied experiences accessible to others. This paper proposes that metaphor functions as a mechanism for the interpersonal reconstruction of embodied experience. The central argument is that metaphor does not merely represent one concept through another; rather, it provides structured experiential cues that integrate perceptual, bodily, and affective dimensions, enabling listeners to partially reconstruct aspects of how a speaker experiences a situation. This reconstruction does not involve the transfer of identical subjective states but the construction of potentially overlapping experiential representations shaped by the source domain, the listener's experiential history, and contextual interpretation. By extending embodied approaches to metaphor with an interpersonal perspective, this framework contributes to broader psychological accounts of communication, social cognition, and the sharing of subjective experience.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsMetaphorSocial CognitionHumansEmbodied cognitionExperiential reconstructionInteroceptionMetaphor comprehensionPerceptual experienceProprioception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.