ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Discovery of a new SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor from a natural product and natural product-like compound database using in silico and in vitro studies.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This current study employs structure-guided virtual screening to identify potential inhibitors from 69,075 natural product or natural product-like compounds in the InterBioscreen (IBS) database against the SARS-CoV-2 Main protease (Mpro), a well-validated target. From high-throughput structure-guided virtual screening, subsequently followed by more rigorous re-docking, top seven compounds were chosen as hits based on their high binding affinity and specific H-bond interactions with the active-site residues of Mpro. All these compounds were new for this target as well as the virus. The stability of the seven protein-ligand complexes was further assessed using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and the MM-GBSA method. The ADME/Tox profile of these seven compounds was also predicted theoretically. After MD simulation, only three compounds, viz. STOCK1N-86169, STOCK1N-88750, and STOCK1N-65657 were identified as high-potential candidates for Mpro inhibition. To confirm the in silico analysis results, an in vitro FRET-based Mpro inhibition assay and an ELISA-based SARS-CoV-2 inhibition assay were performed. From these in vitro investigations, STOCK1N-86169 was identified as the only potent Mpro inhibitor, exhibiting an IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
42776426What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.