ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Discovery of potent and selective MAO-B inhibitors from a morpholine-substituted chalcone library for neurodegenerative disorders.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A series of targeted chalcones (TCs) was designed and synthesised using a microwave-assisted synthetic method to introduce diverse substituents at different positions on the phenyl ring. The structures of all nineteen TC analogues were confirmed by NMR, FTIR, and HRMS. In vitro tests against acetyl- and butyrylcholinesterases (AChE and BuChE), β-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1 (BACE1), and monoamine oxidases (MAO-A and MAO-B) showed that MAO-B was the most potent and selective. Among them, TC12 was the strongest inhibitor (IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
42776425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.