ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2026
Genome-wide association study for refractive error imputed from fundus images via deep learning: a proof-of-concept study.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether deep learning-predicted phenotypes from fundus photographs can serve as surrogate phenotypes for genome-wide association studies (GWAS), using spherical equivalent as a model trait. We assessed concordance between genetic associations derived from measured and AI-imputed values. STUDY
designCross-sectional analysis integrating deep learning-based prediction with genetic association in a population-based cohort.
methodsThis study included 9850 participants from the Nagahama Study. A Swin Transformer was fine-tuned to predict spherical equivalent from fundus photographs. Model training was performed on participants without genotype data who had not undergone cataract surgery. The trained model was then applied to the remaining participants to generate AI-imputed spherical equivalent values. GWAS were conducted separately for measured and AI-imputed spherical equivalent. Concordance between GWAS results was assessed by overlap of significant Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and correlation of effect size estimates.
resultsThe model achieved an MAE of 0.78 diopters (D) and a Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) of 0.92 on an independent test set. The GWAS using AI-imputed spherical equivalent captured all genome-wide significant SNPs identified in the measured spherical equivalent GWAS. Effect-size estimates derived from AI-imputed GWAS were highly concordant with those from measured GWAS across the genome (r = 0.96).
conclusionsDeep learning-imputed spherical equivalent from fundus images can serve as a reliable surrogate phenotype for genetic discovery. This approach enables large-scale and cost-efficient GWAS for phenotypes that are difficult or expensive to ascertain in cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42776408What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.