SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Effectiveness and Safety of Colorectal Cancer Screening Via Fecal Occult Blood Testing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs using fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT or FIT) among adults aged 45-75 years.
methodsWe included studies comparing participants in population-based CRC screening programs with unscreened individuals. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, CRC-specific mortality, CRC incidence, and stage IV CRC incidence. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Pooled RRs were calculated by meta-analysis, and certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.
resultsNo difference was observed in all-cause mortality (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01; 5 studies, 1,474,576 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). RCTs evaluating gFOBT demonstrated a reduction in CRC-specific mortality (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.94; 5 studies, 1,474,576 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), corresponding to 38 fewer CRC deaths per 100,000 individuals screened (95% CI, 55 fewer to 21 fewer). Non-RCTs evaluating FIT reported larger reductions in CRC-specific mortality (RR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.20-0.21; 5 studies, 7,435,956 participants), although the certainty of evidence was low. RCTs showed no significant effect on CRC incidence or stage IV CRC incidence, whereas non-RCTs evaluating FIT suggested reductions in both outcomes; however, the certainty of evidence was also low.
conclusionFecal occult blood test-based screening reduces CRC-specific mortality but not all-cause mortality. FIT-based screening may provide additional benefits by reducing CRC incidence and stage IV disease; however, these findings are supported by low-certainty evidence and require confirmation in RCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.