ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Real-World Analysis of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy Followed by Surgery in Esophageal Cancer with Baseline Supraclavicular Lymph Node Involvement.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundManagement of supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastasis in esophageal cancer remains controversial. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) may challenge current staging paradigms. This study evaluated prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with baseline SCLN metastasis receiving nICT and surgery.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 335 ESCC patients (cT1-2N1-3 to T3-4aN0-3 or M1 [limited to SCLN]) receiving nICT and surgery between 2019 and 2021. Patients were stratified into cSCLN+ (n = 110) and cSCLN- (n = 225). Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence patterns were compared. Prognostic factors were assessed by using multivariable Cox regression. The impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) was evaluated within the cSCLN+ subgroup.
resultsPathological response rates were comparable between groups (pCR rates: 20.9% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.238). At a median follow-up of 23.8 months, no significant differences in RFS (p = 0.109) and OS (p = 0.859) were observed, with similar recurrence patterns. Multivariable analysis showed cSCLN status was not an independent prognostic factor. Nevertheless, patients with persistent pathological SCLN positivity (cSCLN+pSCLN+) experienced significantly worse survival (median RFS 12.4 months, median OS 40.4 months; both not reached in other groups). Upper-thoracic tumor and advanced pathological nodal stage were independent risk factors in cSCLN+ cohort. Although PORT did not significantly improve survival in the overall cSCLN+ population, a trend toward improved OS was observed in the cSCLN+pSCLN+ subgroup.
conclusionsEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with clinically positive SCLN might achieve comparable prognosis to those with clinically negative nodes after nICT plus surgery. For patients with residual pathological SCLN positivity, PORT may be considered as a potential strategy to improve survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42776365What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.