ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
Comparative clinical outcomes of monotherapy and combined conservative treatment strategies in lateral epicondylitis: a retrospective cohort study of 420 patients.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLateral epicondylitis is a common degenerative tendinopathy of the elbow that can significantly impair pain, functional capacity, and grip strength. Although various conservative treatment options are available, evidence comparing different conservative treatment combinations remains limited. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of different conservative treatment strategies in patients with lateral epicondylitis. STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study; Level of Evidence: III. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 420 patients with lateral epicondylitis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized according to the conservative treatment strategy received during routine clinical practice: NSAID therapy alone, NSAID combined with orthotic support, NSAID combined with injection therapy (corticosteroid or platelet-rich plasma [PRP]), and NSAID combined with both orthotic support and injection therapy. Injection therapy in this study included only corticosteroid and PRP injections. Pain, functional outcomes, and grip strength were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), and a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up.
resultsSignificant improvements were observed in all groups for VAS, PRTEE, and grip strength scores at 6 months (all p<0.001). However, the magnitude of improvement differed significantly among treatment groups (all p<0.001). The greatest reductions in pain (ΔVAS 4.84 ± 2.02) and PRTEE scores (ΔPRTEE 26.31 ± 9.70), as well as the largest increase in grip strength (ΔGrip 14.88 ± 4.12 kgf), were observed in patients treated with combined NSAID, orthotic support, and injection therapy. In contrast, the NSAID-only group demonstrated the smallest improvements across all outcome measures.
conclusionIn this retrospective single-center cohort, combined conservative treatment strategies were associated with greater short-term improvements in pain, functional outcomes, and grip strength at the 6-month follow-up. Because treatment allocation was non-randomized and treatment groups included heterogeneous orthotic and injection modalities, these findings should be interpreted as observational associations rather than evidence of treatment superiority. Prospective randomized studies with standardized treatment protocols are warranted to determine the optimal conservative treatment strategy for lateral epicondylitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42776294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.