ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
Bioimpedance utility in heart failure.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congestion is a central pathophysiological feature of heart failure (HF) and a major contributor to symptoms and prognosis. Despite the substantial mortality benefit of disease-modifying therapies [1], assessing and managing congestion remains challenging. Existing tools such as clinical examination, blood and urinary biomarkers, and cardiac and lung ultrasound are limited by observer variability, logistical constraints and the need for technical expertise [2]. Comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), which co-exist in up to 60% of patients with heart failure and may contribute to congestion, further complicate assessments, which can lead to worse outcomes [3, 4]. Consequently, there is growing interest in objective, reproducible and accessible tools that complement conventional approaches to congestion assessment by providing additional information on fluid distribution within body compartments. Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) is a non-invasive technique that measures the electrical properties of biological tissues to estimate body composition and fluid distribution. Since the pioneering work of Nyboer in 1959 and Hoffer et al. in 1969 [5], BIA has evolved from a research tool for body composition into a broader clinical technology used across multiple specialties [6]. Advances in multifrequency, segmental, and spectroscopy-based systems have further expanded its potential for assessing fluid compartments in conditions such as HF and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). However, BIA encompasses heterogeneous technologies, parameters and prediction models, and its clinical role remains incompletely defined, with recommendations for further research [7]. This narrative review outlines the physiological principles of bioimpedance, evaluates its applications in HF diagnosis, prognostication, therapeutic guidance and remote monitoring, and explores the methodological and clinical barriers that have restricted its widespread adoption. We discuss its potential as an adjunctive tool for assessing congestion and highlight the key evidence gaps that must be addressed before bioimpedance can be more widely integrated into routine HF care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42776272What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.