Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776270›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

A phase 2 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dose-finding study of oral NEPA for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric patients with cancer.

Priya Patel, Oleg Arakaev, Mikhail Melnikov, Nataliia Dementieva, Alberto Bernareggi, Tingchao Chen, Tulla Spinelli, Stanley Chaleff

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03204279 (A Multicenter Multinational Randomized Double Blind PK/PD Dose-finding Study of Oral Netupitant Given With Oral Palonosetron in Pediatric Cancer Patients for Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Associated With Emetogenic Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03204279 phase2completednot on this map

A Multicenter Multinational Randomized Double Blind PK/PD Dose-finding Study of Oral Netupitant Given With Oral Palonosetron in Pediatric Cancer Patients for Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Associated With Emetogenic Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelsinn Healthcare SARan2017 to 2019Enrolled67ConditionsChemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV)ArmsNetupitant, Palonosetron
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Priya PatelPediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Oleg ArakaevRegional Children's Clinical Hospital #1, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
Mikhail MelnikovChildren's Territorial Clinical Hospital, Krasnodar, Russia.
Nataliia DementievaDnipropetrovsk Regional Children's Clinical Hospital, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Alberto BernareggiHelsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland.
Tingchao ChenHelsinn Pharmaceuticals China, Shanghai, China.
Tulla SpinelliHelsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland.
Stanley ChaleffMaine Medical Center, Maine Children's Cancer Program, Scarborough, ME, 04074, USA. Stanley.Chaleff@mainehealth.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains a significant challenge in pediatric oncology, with limited data guiding optimal antiemetic regimens. This phase 2 study evaluated pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of oral netupitant combined with oral palonosetron (NEPA) in pediatric patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

methodsIn this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-finding study, pediatric patients (< 18 years) were stratified by age, chemotherapy emetogenicity, and schedule. Patients received one of two netupitant doses (1.33 or 4 mg/kg) with palonosetron (20 µg/kg). Efficacy was assessed via complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue medication) during acute (0-24h), delayed (> 24-120h), and overall (0-120h) phases. PK parameters were derived from plasma concentrations of netupitant, its metabolites, and palonosetron. Safety was monitored through adverse events and clinical assessments.

resultsAmong 65 evaluable patients, CR rates were 85.3%, 70.6%, and 70.6% in the lower netupitant dose group, and 87.1%, 71.0%, and 67.7% in the higher dose group, for the acute, delayed, and overall phases, respectively. CR was mostly consistent across age groups and chemotherapy emetogenicity. A trend toward increased CR with higher netupitant exposure (AUC

conclusionA single dose of 4 mg/kg oral netupitant with oral palonosetron was effective and well-tolerated for CINV prevention in pediatric patients, supporting further investigation of NEPA in this population.

trial registrationNCT03204279 [2 July 2017 registration date].

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsIsoquinolinesNauseaPalonosetronPyridinesQuinuclidinesVomitingAdministration, OralAdolescentBenzeneacetamidesChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzeneacetamidesIsoquinolinesnetupitantPalonosetronPiperazinesPyridinesQuinuclidinesChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitingNEPANetupitantPalonosetronPediatric

Identifiers

PMID42776270
PMCPMC13601078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.