ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Factors associated with long-distance travel among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy at a German high-volume tertiary prostate cancer centre.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate determinants of long-distance travel for radical prostatectomy (RP) to a German high-volume tertiary centre.
methodsA total of 15,727 patients underwent RP at our high-volume tertiary centre (2019-2025). Distances from residential postal codes to our centre were computed using the Google Maps Directions API. Long-distance travel was defined a priori as > 300 km. Multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA) was used to identify factors associated with this outcome and were complemented with sensitivity analyses that evaluated alternative distance thresholds (100-400 km), and a continuous log-transformed distance model.
resultsIn our cohort, 10,672 (68%) patients travelled ≤ 300 km. Those who travelled > 300 km were younger (median 64 vs.65 years), more often underwent RARP (80% vs.64%), and were more likely to have private insurance (66% vs.43%) (all p < 0.001). In MVA, younger age, private insurance, RARP, and residence in Towns and Villages (DEGURBA stratification) were independently associated with long-distance travel. These socio-demographic predictors remained highly consistent and significant across all alternative thresholds and the continuous model. Interestingly, greater distance to nearest certified PCa centre reduced the odds of travelling even farther to our centre. Disease-related variables such as EAU risk group and baseline erectile function did not achieve independent predictor status for long-distance travel.
conclusionsNearly one-third of patients bypassed nearby certified providers and travelled > 300 km for RP. Long-distance travel was associated primarily by non-disease-related factors, rather than disease-related, that might affect oncological or functional outcomes. Transparent outcome reporting and counselling are needed to align travel decisions with objective quality metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42776261What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.