Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776226›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026

Waiting time and mortality after hip fracture: findings from a large single-center cohort study.

Mads Sundet, Mette Martinsen, Joseph Sexton, Ulf Sundin, Siri Lillegraven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mads SundetDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Box 23, Vinderen, Oslo, N-0319, Norway. mads.sundet@icloud.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3737-1193
Mette MartinsenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Box 23, Vinderen, Oslo, N-0319, Norway.
Joseph SextonCenter for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ulf SundinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Box 23, Vinderen, Oslo, N-0319, Norway.
Siri LillegravenCenter for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTime to surgery after hip fracture is a potentially modifiable factor that may influence mortality, but the evidence for an association is conflicting for waiting time < 48 h. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between waiting time to surgery and mortality, with waiting time categorized into 12-hour intervals.

methodsWe analysed all hip fractures operated at a large Norwegian hospital between 2015 and 2023. Waiting time from admission to surgery was categorized into 12-hour intervals. Mortality at one week, one month, three months (pre-specified primary endpoint) and one year was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, nursing home residency, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), fracture type, calendar year of surgery, and direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use. Model fit and discrimination were assessed for all models.

resultsThe study included 4136 hip fractures. At the pre-specified primary endpoint of three months, mortality was numerically higher in patients with waiting times > 12 h, but this did not reach statistical significance for any waiting-time category (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.16-1.25, all p > 0.2). Among the secondary, exploratory endpoints, the one-year timepoint showed increased mortality with increased waiting: patients operated between 12 and 24 h had significantly higher one-year mortality (AOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.10-1.72), rising to an AOR of 1.80 (95% CI 1.20-2.71) for waiting times exceeding 48 h.

conclusionsIn this cohort, waiting time beyond 12 h was associated with a higher one-year mortality, but the association was not statistically significant at the primary endpoint at three months. Given the observational design and the possibility of residual confounding, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesTime-to-TreatmentWaiting ListsAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNorwayProximal Femoral FracturesTime FactorsTreatment DelayComorbidityHip fractureMortalitySurgical delayWaiting time

Identifiers

PMID42776226
PMCPMC13601112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.