Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776221›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

MRI assessment of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer: a practical pictorial review.

Italo Ribeiro Cruz, Tábata Xavit Souza E Silva, Eduardo Medeiros Portela de Araújo, Júlia Azevedo Miranda, Kamila Seidel Albuquerque, Luís Gabriel Campos Pires, João Miranda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Italo Ribeiro CruzDepartment of Radiology, Hospital da Restauração, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Tábata Xavit Souza E SilvaDepartment of Radiology, Hapvida, Belém, Pará, Brazil. txavit@gmail.com.
Eduardo Medeiros Portela de AraújoDepartment of Radiology, Hospital São Domingos, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Júlia Azevedo MirandaDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Kamila Seidel AlbuquerqueDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (BP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Luís Gabriel Campos PiresDepartment of Radiology, Hospital São Domingos, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
João MirandaDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extramural venous invasion (EMVI), the spread of rectal tumor cells into veins beyond the muscularis propria, is one of the most prognostically powerful preoperative findings detectable on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Meta-analytic evidence indicates that baseline mrEMVI is associated with an approximately fourfold increased risk of metachronous metastases (OR 3.91; 95% CI 2.61-5.86), and it independently predicts inferior disease-free and overall survival. Despite this evidence, MRI-based EMVI assessment remains inconsistently applied in routine practice. This pictorial review provides a structured, image-focused approach to MRI-detected EMVI, covering the technical requirements for reliable detection, relevant venous anatomy, imaging hallmarks on high-resolution T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging, the validated five-point grading scale, the most clinically significant mimics and pitfalls, and the specific challenges of restaging after neoadjuvant therapy. We also summarize the clinical implications of EMVI grading for treatment intensification, lateral lymph node management, and organ-preservation decisions. Graded MRI assessment of EMVI provides clinically meaningful prognostic information beyond binary positive/negative reporting and is increasingly used to inform multidisciplinary decisions in rectal cancer, although evidence that grade-directed treatment modification improves outcomes remains limited. Reproducible interpretation requires attention to key pitfalls, including equivocal grade 2 findings, small-caliber vessels, and reduced diagnostic reliability after neoadjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Diffusion-weighted imagingExtramural venous invasionMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyRectal cancerStructured reportingTumor staging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.