ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Relationship between a small aortic annulus and clinical and quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA small aortic annulus is associated with impaired hemodynamics after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The impact on long-term clinical or patient-centered outcomes remains unclear.
aimsTo evaluate the association between aortic annulus size and long-term clinical outcomes and patient-reported health status after TAVR.
methodsIn this post-hoc analysis of the multicenter SCOPE I randomized trial, patients were categorized according to computed tomography-derived annular size (small ≤ 430 mm
resultsAmong 732 patients, 323 (44.1%) had a small and 409 (55.9%) larger annulus. Patients with a small annulus were more frequently women and had slightly higher surgical risk. Despite higher transvalvular gradients and a higher prevalence of prosthesis-patient mismatch, patients with a small annulus had no differences in all-cause mortality (18.6% vs 25.4%), heart-failure hospitalization (14.9% vs 15.6%), or patient-reported health status at 3 years, and a comparable probability of being alive with good health status (46.5% vs 43.2%; OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.63-1.44, p = 0.81). In an exploratory factorial analysis, a small annulus treated with a balloon-expandable valve was associated with a lower probability of this integrated outcome (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.85; p for interaction = 0.004).
conclusionsPatients with small aortic annuli experience comparable long-term survival and quality-of-life recovery after TAVR. Exploratory analyses suggest that valve type may influence patient-centered outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42776203What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.