Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776202›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026

Effectiveness and clinical impact of functional post-PCI optimization-a systematic review and individual patient-data meta-analysis.

Annemieke C Ziedses des Plantes, Tara Neleman, Abdul Hakeem, Barry F Uretsky, Shiv K Agarwal, Kristin Miller, Damien Collison, Keith Oldroyd, William Wijns, Antonio Maria Leone and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Annemieke C Ziedses des PlantesDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, the Netherlands.
Tara NelemanDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, the Netherlands.
Abdul HakeemRobert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Barry F UretskyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Shiv K AgarwalUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Kristin MillerUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Damien CollisonWest of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Keith OldroydWest of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
William WijnsThe Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, The Smart Sensors Lab and Curam, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Antonio Maria LeoneCenter of Excellence in Cardiovascular Science, Ospedale Isola Tiberina-Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BurzottaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Carlo TraniUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Domenico GalanteCenter of Excellence in Cardiovascular Science, Ospedale Isola Tiberina-Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy.
Massoud A LeesarDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Sanne E HoeksDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, the Netherlands.
Nicolas M Van MieghemDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, the Netherlands.
Joost DaemenDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, the Netherlands. j.daemen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8628-1410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuboptimal post-PCI FFR values are associated with impaired clinical outcomes. The determinants and clinical impact of FFR improvement through optimization remain unclear. This study sought to evaluate the effect of post-PCI optimization on fractional flow reserve (FFR) values and to identify predictors of successful optimization.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis including patients who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents with paired FFR measurements before and after post-PCI optimization. A one-stage meta-analysis was performed using mixed-effects models. The primary endpoint was the absolute increase in FFR after optimization.

resultsOut of 1945 screened studies, a total of 11 studies met the selection criteria for the present meta-analysis and IPD was provided from 8 studies. In 314 patients, the median (interquartile range) FFR value significantly improved from 0.81 (0.75-0.85) to 0.86 (0.81-0.89) after optimization (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, LAD vessel and higher post-PCI FFR values were negative predictors for the magnitude of FFR increase, whereas optimization using an additional stent was associated with a larger FFR increase as compared to post-dilatation alone. The effect of additional stenting was more pronounced in patients with lower post-PCI FFR values.

conclusionsPost-PCI optimization after angiographically successful PCI resulted in a significant increase in post-PCI FFR. The success of optimization of suboptimal FFR values was associated with target vessel location, initial post-PCI FFR value and optimization method.

Indexed as

Fractional flow reservePCI optimizationPercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.