ArticleClinical neuroradiology2026
Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction in Ultra-High-Resolution CT Venography for Improved Visualization of Cerebral Venous Drainage.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic confidence and image quality of deep-learning-enhanced ultra-high-resolution CT venography (CTV) in venous neurovascular imaging, compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction of ultra-high-resolution CT datasets and normal-resolution CTV.
methodsThis retrospective, single-center study included 31 consecutive patients with suspected cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis who underwent CTV. CTV datasets were reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction with (i) Normal-Resolution CTV (NR-CTV), (ii) an Ultra-High-Resolution CTV (UHR-CTV), and (iii) a deep learning algorithm specifically trained for neurovascular imaging, applied to the UHR-CTV datasets (DL-UHR-CTV). Quantitative analyses included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and frequency power spectra (FPS). Qualitative evaluation of image quality, contrast, noise, artifacts, diagnostic confidence, and assessability of dural sinuses and intracranial veins was performed by three radiologists using a 4-point Likert scale. A descriptive analysis assessed concordant detection of venous pathologies across reconstructions.
resultsSNR and CNR in DL-UHR-CTV were significantly higher than in UHR-CTV (SNR: p = 0.02; CNR: p = 0.01). NR-CTV and DL-UHR-CTV were similar. Compared to NR-CTV and UHR-CTV, DL-UHR-CTV showed a significantly lower FPS amplitude across wide frequency ranges. In qualitative analysis, DL-UHR-CTV outperformed UHR-CTV in all parameters (p < 0.001) except vessel contrast (p = 0.09) and was better than NR-CTV in all categories (p < 0.001). All 20 venous pathologies (12 patients) were detected on all three reconstructions without false-positive findings.
conclusionDeep-learning-based reconstruction significantly enhances image quality and venous visualization in ultra-high-resolution CT venography compared with conventional iterative reconstruction, enabling detailed depiction of small venous structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42776197What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.