ReviewHNO2026
[Surgical trials in head and neck cancer at the 2026 ASCO Annual Meeting].
Review in HNO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At the 2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, once again, only a small number of presentations focused primarily on surgery. Nevertheless, surgical questions could be seen to be becoming increasingly important within perioperative multimodal treatment concepts. The most relevant contributions were secondary analyses of the phase III KEYNOTE-689 and NIVOPOSTOP trials. These data showed that, despite a higher rate of documented R0 resection and a lower frequency of pathological high-risk features after neoadjuvant immunotherapy, no reduction in the extent of resection could yet be justified and that oncologically indicated neck dissection should not be limited when postoperative immunotherapy was planned. Randomised data on adjuvant radiotherapy after adequately performed surgery for pT1-2 pN0 oral cavity cancer further emphasised the importance of clearly defined surgical quality criteria. New data on mandibular, laryngeal and pharyngeal preservation after neoadjuvant treatment reported high rates of R0 resection and organ preservation. However, small cohorts, the absence of control groups and insufficiently standardised indications for surgery preclude changes in clinical practice. Histological analyses demonstrated heterogeneous regression patterns with residual tumour islands after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and argued against reducing surgical margins solely based on radiological response. Ongoing randomised trials of neck dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy and salvage surgery were still recruiting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42776192What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.