Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42776181›Full record

ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Generative artificial intelligence and language models in trauma surgery : Applications in clinical care, research and teaching].

S Kuhn

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S KuhnInstitut für Digitale Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH (UKGM), Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35042, Marburg, Deutschland. sebastian.kuhn@uni-marburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenerative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLM) are evolving from general purpose text assistants toward increasingly contextualized, multimodal systems integrated into clinical workflows.

objectivePresentation of current applications of generative AI and LLMs in trauma surgery, with a focus on clinical care and additional aspects of research and teaching. MATERIAL AND

methodsNarrative literature review based on a MEDLINE/PubMed search and supplementary hand search, including primary regulatory sources.

resultsThe most immediate clinical potential currently lies in documentation, information processing and patient communication. Initial studies demonstrate relevant time savings with AI-assisted documentation. Current systems achieve high performance in some clearly defined triage and decision-support tasks, whereas complex individualized and multimodal applications show lower and more heterogeneous reliability. In research and teaching LLMs can support standardized workflows, case generation and learning activities; however, the available evidence is still frequently based on retrospective or simulated studies.

conclusionThe safe implementation requires validation of the specific AI system in its intended context of use, reliable knowledge sources, sufficient clinical context, data protection and effective human control. As the clinical consequences of AI-generated outputs increase, so do the requirements for validation and physician responsibility in making decisions.

Indexed as

AI LiteracyClinical Decision SupportDigital MedicineMedical DocumentationPatient Communication

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.