Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42775935›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2026

Rethinking Preoperative MRI in Early Breast Cancer: Who Truly Benefits?

Burak Çelik, Sevcan Koç, Yusuf Hüseyin Berrak, Gizem Yaşa, Medine Böge, Ece Dilege

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Burak ÇelikDepartment of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8626-7675
Sevcan KoçDepartment of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0009-8253-4949
Yusuf Hüseyin BerrakKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0006-6816-5081
Gizem YaşaKoç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0007-7026-7834
Medine BögeDepartment of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-4822-9755
Ece DilegeDepartment of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0160-0350

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In light of existing evidence on the use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing upfront surgery, this study evaluated whether adding MRI to conventional imaging improved the definition of disease extent, subsequent surgical management, and survival outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study reviewed patients with stage I-II BC who underwent upfront surgery between January 2014 and September 2025. Patients were divided into an MRI cohort and a non-MRI cohort, and clinicopathologic characteristics, the diagnostic performance of ultrasound and MRI in detecting additional malignant foci, the type of surgery, and recurrence during follow-up were compared. Results: A total of 261 patients were included, with 149 assigned to the MRI cohort and 112 to the non-MRI cohort. Patients in the MRI group were younger, more often premenopausal, and more likely to have dense breasts. MRI detected additional malignant foci, including ductal carcinoma Conclusion: Preoperative MRI occasionally changed surgical plans but offered no diagnostic advantage over standard imaging, supporting its selective rather than routine use in upfront BC surgery.

Indexed as

Breast MRIearly breast cancersurgical managementultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42775935
PMCPMC13599736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.