Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42775906›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2026

Role of Chest Wall Perforator Flaps in Breast Surgery: Military Cancer Centre Experience.

Saleh Habahbeh, Muthanna Ababneh, Ahmad Kofahi, Abdullah Bani Fares, Mohannad Bawaneh, Mothana Yousef Al-Nawaflh, Mohammad Isam Bany Doumi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saleh HabahbehDepartment of Surgery, Military Cancer Center, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0002-6757-2137
Muthanna AbabnehDepartment of Surgery, Military Cancer Center, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0006-0776-0856
Ahmad KofahiDepartment of Surgery, Military Cancer Center, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0000-1242-9531
Abdullah Bani FaresDepartment of Surgery, Military Cancer Center, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0000-9226-1774
Mohannad BawanehDepartment of Surgery, Military Cancer Center, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0008-5610-7102
Mothana Yousef Al-NawaflhDepartment of Histopathology, Military Cancer Center, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0002-6842-4291
Mohammad Isam Bany DoumiDepartment of Radiology, Military Cancer Center, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Chest wall perforator flaps (CWPFs) are a muscle-sparing alternative in oncoplastic breast surgery (OPBS). CWPFs offer favourable cosmetic and surgical outcomes while minimising donor-site morbidity. Despite their increasing global adoption, there is a paucity of data from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This retrospective, descriptive case series aimed to assess our institutional experience with CWPFs, emphasising their feasibility, versatility, and surgical and cosmetic results in breast surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case series included all patients who underwent CWPF-based OPBS at the Military Cancer Centre between December 2017 and January 2025. Data on patient demographics, tumour characteristics, surgical indications, flap types and techniques, complications, and patient satisfaction were collected. Results: CWPF procedures were performed on 69 patients. The most popular flap type (78.3%) was the lateral intercostal artery flap. Indications included volume replacement (84.1%), implant coverage (4.3%), implant salvage (2.9%), wound closure (7.2%), and deformity correction (1.4%). Most flaps were intended to be turnover flaps (75.4%) rather than propeller flaps (24.6%). No flap loss was noted; the complication rates were low, and the re-excision rate was 0%. Over 85% of patients reported good-to-excellent satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes. Conclusion: CWPFs are reliable and versatile techniques in breast-conserving surgery and OPBS, serving as a surgical solution for various reconstructive indications. The findings from this study emphasise the need for broader adoption of CWPFs in Jordan and the MENA region and demonstrate the effective use of CWPFs at a national centre in Jordan.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast reconstructionChest wall perforator flapsoncoplastic surgeryretrospective observational study

Identifiers

PMID42775906
PMCPMC13599738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.