ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2026
Role of Chest Wall Perforator Flaps in Breast Surgery: Military Cancer Centre Experience.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Chest wall perforator flaps (CWPFs) are a muscle-sparing alternative in oncoplastic breast surgery (OPBS). CWPFs offer favourable cosmetic and surgical outcomes while minimising donor-site morbidity. Despite their increasing global adoption, there is a paucity of data from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This retrospective, descriptive case series aimed to assess our institutional experience with CWPFs, emphasising their feasibility, versatility, and surgical and cosmetic results in breast surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective case series included all patients who underwent CWPF-based OPBS at the Military Cancer Centre between December 2017 and January 2025. Data on patient demographics, tumour characteristics, surgical indications, flap types and techniques, complications, and patient satisfaction were collected. Results: CWPF procedures were performed on 69 patients. The most popular flap type (78.3%) was the lateral intercostal artery flap. Indications included volume replacement (84.1%), implant coverage (4.3%), implant salvage (2.9%), wound closure (7.2%), and deformity correction (1.4%). Most flaps were intended to be turnover flaps (75.4%) rather than propeller flaps (24.6%). No flap loss was noted; the complication rates were low, and the re-excision rate was 0%. Over 85% of patients reported good-to-excellent satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes. Conclusion: CWPFs are reliable and versatile techniques in breast-conserving surgery and OPBS, serving as a surgical solution for various reconstructive indications. The findings from this study emphasise the need for broader adoption of CWPFs in Jordan and the MENA region and demonstrate the effective use of CWPFs at a national centre in Jordan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.