ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2026
Primary Surgery in Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the effect of local-regional management of the primary tumor on the prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The primary outcome measure was overall survival, while progression-free survival was assessed as a secondary end-point. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed metastatic breast cancer patients who underwent local-regional treatment over a 10-year period (May 2013 to May 2023). Sociodemographic and clinicopathological data were extracted from medical records and automated hospital systems. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. Results: The study cohort consisted of 76 patients, with a mean age of 50 years and a median follow-up period of 58 months. The progression-free survival rate was 58%, while overall survival reached 75%, and the 5-year survival rate was 80%. Importantly, no deaths were observed among patients who achieved a pathological complete response during follow-up. Analysis of survival outcomes revealed that overall survival was significantly reduced in patients with axillary lymph node metastasis compared to those without ( Conclusion: In metastatic breast cancer, surgical resection of the primary tumor was associated with improved overall survival and progression-free survival. While a response to systemic chemotherapy was a favorable prognostic factor, increased tumor size, axillary lymph node positivity, triple-negative status, and the development of new metastasis and/or recurrence during follow-up were associated with poorer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.