ReviewCureus2026
Intracapsular Versus Extracapsular Tonsillectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tonsillectomy is a common procedure associated with significant postoperative morbidity. Intracapsular tonsil surgery (ICTS), which preserves the tonsillar capsule, may reduce complications compared to traditional extracapsular tonsil surgery (ECTS). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates comparative outcomes of ICTS and ECTS, focusing on adult and mixed-age populations. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICTS and ECTS in adult and mixed-age populations (mean age ≥18 years). Primary outcomes were postoperative pain and hemorrhage; secondary outcomes included analgesia use and recovery. Data were pooled using meta-analysis where appropriate. Four RCTs (n=231) were included. ICTS was associated with significantly lower postoperative pain scores and reduced analgesia requirements. The pooled risk of postoperative hemorrhage was significantly lower with ICTS (Risk Ratio 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.78, p=0.01). Recovery to normal diet and activity was faster following ICTS. The primary trade-off was a higher incidence of tonsillar remnants, though long-term symptom control remained effective. ICTS may reduce postoperative pain, analgesic use, and hemorrhage risk compared with ECTS, though evidence is limited by small sample sizes, mixed-age populations, and heterogeneous techniques, warranting further adult-specific RCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.