Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42775370›Full record

ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2026

Comparison of One-Stage (Posterior-Only Approach) and Two-Stage (Combined Anterior-Posterior Approach) Surgery in Treating Spinal Tuberculosis.

Ali Andalib, Majid Rezvani, Soroush Kazerani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali AndalibDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Majid RezvaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Soroush KazeraniDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limited research has examined the effectiveness of posterior-only versus combined anterior-posterior surgical techniques for spinal tuberculosis (STB). This study sought to assess and compare these two surgical methods. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective review of 20 patients with STB who received a posterior-only intervention (group A) and 20 patients who underwent a combined anterior-posterior procedure (group B). We analyzed and compared the outcomes of both groups. Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in the visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index; however, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The average hospital stay for group A was significantly shorter ( Conclusion: Both the combined anterior-posterior and posterior-only surgical approaches can yield satisfactory clinical and radiological results in treating STB. Conversely, the posterior-only approach effectively achieves lesion debridement, decompression, and the maintenance of stability, along with the potential benefit of a reduced hospital stay.

Indexed as

Combined anterior-posterior approachposterior-only approachspinal tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID42775370
PMCPMC13597040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.