Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42775361›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Spotting the Diagnosis: A Case Report of Paraneoplastic Retinopathy Masquerading As White Dot Syndrome.

Aakanksha Gundu, Henry Holt, Ann Ostrovsky

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aakanksha GunduDivision of Ophthalmology, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, USA.
Henry HoltDivision of Ophthalmology, East Carolina University Health Medical Center, Greenville, USA.
Ann OstrovskyDivision of Ophthalmology, East Carolina University Health Medical Center, Greenville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to report a rare case of presumed paraneoplastic retinopathy in a patient with multiple sclerosis who initially presented with clinical findings suggestive of white dot syndrome. This report describes a complex neuro-ophthalmic presentation where initial diagnostic considerations were reframed to reach the final diagnosis. A 46-year-old female with a past medical history of multiple sclerosis presented with progressively worsening vision in the left eye, a central blind spot, and visual disturbances. Initially, her symptoms were attributed to multiple sclerosis-associated optic neuritis or a white dot syndrome. However, the patient's atypical clinical course and lack of response to treatment broadened the differential diagnosis to include masquerade syndromes. The inconclusive results of a vitrectomy, worsening vision, new involvement of both eyes, and lack of response to traditional treatment ultimately led to a presumed diagnosis of paraneoplastic retinopathy. This case study informs ophthalmologists about ocular conditions with similar presentations and emphasizes the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis, conducting diligent investigation, and engaging in multidisciplinary collaboration when faced with complex neuro-ophthalmic presentations.

Indexed as

multidisciplinary follow-upsmultiple sclerosisocular oncologyparaneoplastic retinopathyrelentless placoid chorioretinitiswhite dot syndromes

Identifiers

PMID42775361
PMCPMC13597000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.