ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Central Vertical Spreading: A Structured Technique for Vaginal Extraction of Large Fibroids.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Extraction of large fibroids during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) remains technically challenging, particularly under limited vaginal visualization. Current transvaginal extraction methods are often experience dependent, and standardized procedural sequences have not been fully established. Case Description/Technique Description: We describe a structured central vertical spreading technique for transvaginal extraction of large fibroids following laparoscopic enucleation during TLH. The specimen is placed in a retrieval bag and exteriorized vaginally. Controlled vertical incisions confined to the visible operative field are performed sequentially, followed by rotational repositioning and connection of incision lines. This stepwise sequence progressively reduces the effective extraction diameter while preserving structural continuity. Five consecutive cases after protocol standardization were evaluated to assess procedural feasibility. Discussion: The technique introduces a structured geometric principle that transforms vaginal specimen extraction from an experience-dependent maneuver into a reproducible procedural technique. In this series, all specimens were removed without powered morcellation, additional port placement, bag rupture, or extraction-related complications. This nonpowered approach may offer a structured alternative to powered morcellation in appropriately selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.